(FILES) In this file whine taken on October 02, 2020 Paris Saint-Germain’s Qatari president Nasser Al-Khelaifi attends the French L1 soccer match between Paris Saint-Germain (PSG) and Angers (SCO) at the Parc des Princes stadium in Paris. – The Swiss public prosecutor’s office on February 16, 2021 has appealed against the acquittal in October 2020 of Nasser Al-Khelaifi, head of beIN Media and Paris SG, in a TV rights case additionally piquant used Fifa number 2 Jerome Valcke. (Characterize by FRANCK FIFE / AFP)
Swiss prosecutors are appealing the acquittal of Paris Saint-Germain president Nasser Al-Khelaifi on accusations of corruption within the attribution of soccer broadcasting rights, a spokeswoman suggested AFP on Tuesday.
Khelaifi, head of broadcasting crew beIN Media, used to be acquitted in October after a trial by which he appeared alongside used FIFA secretary accepted Jerome Valcke.
The first of the many soccer scandals to lead to a judicial dedication, the trial before the Federal Court of Bellinzona resulted in a nearly complete setback for the prosecution in October.
The Swiss Public Prosecutor’s Location of job (MPC) acquired the formal judgement in January and “filed a assertion of appeal in February” to glimpse “the conviction of the three accused”, the spokeswoman acknowledged.
The prosecution alleged that at a meeting in October 2013 at the French headquarters of beIN, Al-Khelaifi promised to get rid of a villa in Sardinia for 5 million euros ($6.06 million), granting its abnormal use to Valcke in alternate for crimson meat up in its declare for the TV rights in North Africa and the Middle East for the 2026 and 2030 World Cups.
At the hearings in September, prosecutors requested 28 months imprisonment for Al-Khelaifi, who is Qatari, and three years for Frenchman Valcke.
The Federal Prison Court stumbled on Valcke guilty of a civil offence however now now not a prison one.
It ruled the cost used to be “certainly a bribe” and ordered Valcke to pay damages to FIFA, in accordance with the time he had spent within the villa, however the court did now not secure him guilty of “unfair administration”, a fee which could possibly perchance believe required proof that the settlement between the 2 males harmed FIFA.
The court ruled “there could be nothing to show that FIFA also can believe acquired a more advantageous contract” than the one signed with beIN. It used to be price $480 million for two World Cups, 60 percent more than for the 2018 and 2022 World Cups.
The court acquitted Al-Khelaifi when it comes to that fee. A fee of “personal corruption” used to be dropped after FIFA withdrew its criticism in January 2020 following an settlement with the Qatari, the phrases of which were never made public.
Al-Khelaifi’s lawyers issued a assertion on Tuesday evening.
“We’ll now not benefit this latest decided transfer by the prosecution with any detailed comment in any diagram,” the assertion acknowledged.
“Nonetheless, for the avoidance of any doubt, we will affirm the glaring: our consumer used to be fully acquitted in October, after essentially the most exhaustive four-year investigation, essentially the most total two-week trial, and where the prosecution offered each and each shred of proof and recommend each and each which you have to factor in belief, however proved nothing. Absolutely nothing has changed since October, either essentially or in law.”
In a separate case, Valcke used to be accused of receiving 1.25 million euros from Dinos Deris to learn create the media rights to several World Cups in Greece and Italy: he used to be again cleared of essentially the most important fee, however convicted of having entered these bribes as “loans” in his accounts.
The spokeswoman acknowledged the MPC used to be additionally appealing the prison verdict in that case.